[SDNY] PATREON walks into so-called litigation chainsaw with allegations of racketeering

The cultish San Francisco Millennials that run the "tree house" at PATREON (a potential Securities and Exchange Commission regulated firm) may be running afoul of the U.S. Department of Security and potential racketeering charges

Would such entanglements push a PATREON IPO overboard?

Looks like an Owen Benjamin 2.0 lawsuit is in the future for PATREON, deja vu again.

Colin Sullivan, so-called attorney, claims to be the Vice President for "legal" at PATREON, the haunt of Jason Goodman and his video productions that display his personality disorders.

Click here for stock options of executives

MEANWHILE GEORGE WEBB MAY SUE PATREON

Questions have been swirling on the Internet if GEORGE WEBB would ever file a lawsuit against PATREON for the manner in which he was kicked off the platform.

Latest documents in the GEORGE WEBB versus Jason Goodman lawsuit.

Click for PDF

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Other rumors are circulating about a possible wider investigation by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security into social media platforms that host single-purpose hate accounts on PATREON and Odysee, etc. It seems Jason Goodman and George Webb will be the turds in the punch bowl that sink a PATREON or Odysee defense.

According to court documents Colin Sullivan writes the Terms of Use agreements for PATREON, see the ugly Owen Benjamin and PATREON affair.

PATREON WALKS INTO CHAIN SAW

Questions have been raised about Owen Benjamin's so-called proposed R.V. camp in Idaho.

OPINION AND EDITORIAL

FUN FACT: "Establishing a federal civil cause of action for individuals whose intimate visual images are disclosed without their consent, allowing a victim to recover damages and legal fees; creating a new National Resource Center on Cybercrimes Against Individuals; and supporting State, Tribal, and local government efforts to prevent and prosecute cybercrimes, including cyberstalking and the nonconsensual distribution of intimate images."

Fair Use Act Disclaimer

This site is for educational purposes only!!

**FAIR USE**

Copyright Disclaimer under section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education and research.

Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.

Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.

FAIR USE DEFINITION:

(Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fair_use)

Fair use is a doctrine in the United States copyright law that allows limited use of copyrighted material without requiring permission from the rights holders, such as for commentary, criticism, news reporting, research, teaching or scholarship. It provides for the legal, non-licensed citation or incorporation of copyrighted material in another author’s work under a four-factor balancing test. The term “fair use” originated in the United States. A similar principle, fair dealing, exists in some other common law jurisdictions. Civil law jurisdictions have other limitations and exceptions to copyright.